Friday, April 29, 2011

G.Skill Ripjaws-X 8GB

0 comments
Ripjaws-X 8GB (F3-17000CL9D-8GBXLD)
Add to Cart
Specs: Capacity: 8GB (2x 4GB); CAS Latency: 9-11-9-28-2N; Frequency: DDR3-2133 (PC3-17000);
Voltage: 1.65V; Unbuffered; Non-ECC; Warranty: Lifetime
The G.Skill Ripjaws-X 8GB memory
kit (model F3-17000CL9D-8GBXLD),
is tuned for Sandy Bridge and qualified on
a variety of popular motherboards from
enthusiast staples such as Asus, Gigabyte,
ASRock, Biostar, and MSI. The kit also
supports XMP for easy configuration.
This kit features lightweight aluminum
heat spreaders with fins that extend upward
from the PCB at a few different angles,
giving them an aggressive look. Also included
with the kit is G.Skill’s Turbulence II active
memory cooler, which is outfitted with a
pair of lighted, blue fans. The cooler snaps
onto the memory retention clips and blows
air directly onto the DIMMs. Even after
hours of testing and benchmarking with
the memory running at 2,133MHz, it was
hardly warm to the touch.
The kit was also rock solid and
worked perfectly in an array of motherboards
(Zotac, MSI, Asus, and Gigabyte)
we had available for testing. Using an
Asus P8P67 Deluxe and Core i7-2600K
as our testbed, the G.Skill Ripjaws-X
memory produced 27GBps of peak
bandwidth (stock 1,333MHz kits peak
around 16GBps) in SiSoft Sandra’s
memory bandwidth benchmark. And
Sandra’s memory latency test yielded a
result of 56.3ns. Finally, a low-resolution
Crysis benchmark resulted in a frame
rate of 233.91fps, which is quite a bit
higher than the 207.4fps we got from
the stock Sandy Bridge setup using
1,333MHz memory.
With an asking price of about 200 bucks,
the G.Skill Ripjaws-X 8GB memory kit
is significantly more expensive than most
other dual-channel DDR3 kits currently on
the market. It is, however, one of the highest
clocked kits available, and its performance
is excellent.


Customer FeedBack


Great item, fast low voltage RAM!
By Lu
The RAM runs is 9-9-9-24, which is slightly above average (not the best, but not bad) for a base speed of 1600MHz. It is 1.5v as well, which is an improvement on the standard 1.65v DDR3 that has been coming out in the last few years. Finally, the heatsinks works great as well if you plan to OC the RAM. They might be a bit tall for some CPU coolers, but for reference my CM N520 and my friend's Prolimatech Megahalem all clears the RAM without much trouble.
My RAM has been working fine OCed to 1800MHz and slower timings for half a year!

Ripjaws 8Gb
By javelbe74
Great memories, work really well without complications.

System:
CPU: Phenom II X4 955 BE
Mobo: Asus M4A79T-Deluxe
RAM: 8Gb Ripjaws
H. Drive primary: 300 Gb velociraptor
H. Drive data & games: 1.5 Tb x2 (raid 0) Seagate 7200.11
GPU: XFX HD 6970 2Gb
Case: Kandalf LCS 

Read more FeedBack



Article From Computer Power User Magazine
Click here to Read more...

Monday, April 25, 2011

Gigabyte P67A-UD4

0 comments
To witness Gigabyte’s complete vision of a
Sandy Bridge motherboard, turn to page
62. The P67A-UD4, on the other hand, is
Gigabyte’s answer for the common man.
Gigabyte keeps the black PCB but
accents the slate gray heatsinks with
blue touches. A 12-phase VRM flanks
the LGA1155 socket for consistent and
stable CPU power under load and when
overclocked. Speaking of, overclocking

P67A-UD4
$207 ❘ Gigabyte
Add to cart

 















options abound: You can manually tweak
settings in the BIOS, overclock from a
mobile device using Cloud OC, or use


hotkeys to cycle through m u l t i p l e
overclocking profiles. Gigabyte also built
the P67A-UD4 on a 2-ounce copper
PCB, used solid-state capacitors, included
hardware-based overvoltage control, and
consolidated the MOSFETs and driver IC
into a unified Driver MOSFET.
Gigabyte also includes its Hybrid
BIOS, which supports 3TB+ hard drives.
Onboard, there are two PCI-E x16 slots
for two-way SLI or CrossFireX, a Gigabit
LAN port, two internal 6Gbps SATA
ports plus two external 6Gbps eSATA
ports, and up to four USB 3.0 ports.
The Gigabyte P67A-UD4 offers
significantly fewer features compared to
the UD7, but it lets you push your Sandy
Bridge processor to its limits without
breaking the bank.



Benchmark Results                Gigabyte P67A-UD4
3DMark 11 Performance

3DMark Overall                         P4494
Graphics Score                          4195
Physics Score                            7625
Combined Score                        4162
PCMark Vantage Pro 1.0.2
Overall                                     18278
Memories                                 11540
TV And Movies                          7027
Gaming                                    16154
Music                                       18416
Communications                       18596
Productivity                              18651
HDD 26137
Cinebench                                 11.5
CPU*                                        6.78
POV-Ray 3.7 Beta**
Aliens vs. Predator                      27.5
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.:                           25.58 


Test system specs: Processor: 3.4GHz Intel Core
i7-2600K; RAM: 4GB OCZ Platinum XTE DDR3-
2000; Hard drive: 256GB Plextor PX-M2 SSD;
PSU: Antec TruePower Quattro 1200
Specs: Chipset: Intel P67; Form Factor: ATX;
Memory: Up to 32GB (DDR3-2133); Ports:
Gigabit Ethernet, 2 6Gbps SATA, 4 3Gbps
SATA, 2 6Gbps eSATA, 2+2 USB 3.0, S/PDIF
coaxial/optical out, Realtek ALC892 audio;
Slots: 2 PCI-E x16, 3 PCI-E x1, 2 PCI



Customer Feedback

Best P67 motherboard for the money (IMO)!
By TheTruthHurts
Aside from the included software (a bit of which caused my computer to repeatedly blue screen (don't install the Apple USB bit) (I didn't install anything aside from the ethernet driver)), this is an excellent, essentially perfect motherboard to use as the foundation for a new Sandy Bridge system (I went with the 2500k). It has basically anything you could ever want or need in a board, and features (essential, in my opinion) that other boards simply do not offer. These include:

-Dolby Home Theater (which includes Dolby Digital Live 5.1 (5.1 gaming over optical/coaxial (this board has both!)))
-Dual-bios (it's kicked in twice (while adjusting CPU and GPU clocks) in the week that I've owned it (the PC attempted boot twice, failed, then re-booted with prior settings from the 2nd bios automatically...awesome!))
-USB 3.0 (two external, plus headers for more)
-2x External SATA (plus internal headers) (I'll never use them, but it's nice that they're there)
-four fan headers, each of which supports *2.5A* (per Gigabyte's response to my e-mail)(CPU, System 1, System 2, Power (1 and Power run full-blast, and 2 runs half-speed by default (if I had to complain about something)))
-SLI-ready (though I'll probably trade the 560 Ti for something with 2GB (yeah, it matters) down the road instead)
-12-phase CPU power...the 2500k is OC'd to 43x (base; turbo off), and not a hint of an issue (and by the way, my entire system pulls 73W at rest (CPU = 1600 MHz)...unheard of!)
-solid caps, and obvious ultra-high-quality construction *black* PCB (high function and style...the best-looking board I've ever seen, especially in person)
-2x Sata3 (no, don't need them yet...but when I hopefully upgrade the SSD to a Vertex 3, well...)
-etc.  

See Full FeedBack


Article By Computer Power User Magazine
Click here to Read more...

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 580 GV-N580UD-15I

0 comments
Both Nvidia and AMD offer compelling
options for gamers with deep
pockets, which made selecting the graphics
cards for our rig a difficult task. Although
the GeForce GTX 580 is unequivocally
the fastest single-GPU graphics card on
the planet, AMD’s dual-GPU Radeon HD
6990 is the fastest card overall.
Ultimately, Nvidia gets our nod because
the SLI rig can deliver triple-monitor
gaming like AMD’s 6990 CrossFireXon-
a-card, but also with the added
bonus of 3D Vision Surround. Yeah, we
know AMD has 3D, too, but Nvidia’s
scheme is the more fleshed out of the
two. From a gaming standpoint, PhysX
is also compelling for supported games.
CUDA also offers a few gaming-themed
enhancements that stand out, for instance,
Just Cause 2’s impressive water effects.
The GTX 480 based on the original Fermi
architecture had a problem with leaky
transistors, but the GF110 GPU inside the

Gigabyte GeForce
GTX 580 GV-N580UD-15I
Add to cart

GTX 580 is a significantly refined Fermi
that solves that problem and subsequently
is cooler, quieter under load, and capable
of running DirectX 11 games with settings
maxed out on even the highest resolutions.
The GPU inside the GeForce GTX 580
features 16 SMs for a total of 512 CUDA
cores, 64 texture units, and 48 ROPs. The
memory subsystem consists of 1,536MB
dedicated GDDR5 memory, clocked at
1,002MHz and running on a 384-bit bus.
The reference GTX 580 has a core clock of
772MHz, but Gigabyte upped the ante by
overclocking the graphics card to 795MHz.
Additional features previously touched
upon include support for PhysX, SLI, and
CUDA-based GPGPU computing.
Running a pair of GTX 580s in SLI
will generate a lot of heat, so our goal
in selecting the graphics cards was to try
to minimize the thermal impact on the


overall system as much as possible by
selecting a GTX 580 with a better-thanstock
cooler. Gigabyte’s GV-N580UD-15I
is a GTX 580 with an aftermarket cooler
we had to see to believe.
The overclocked Ultra Durable VGA
Series GeForce GTX 580 straps Nvidia’s
current flagship powerhouse to a large
copper vapor chamber and aluminum
fin heatsink that spans the length of the
board. The Windforce 3X cooler utilizes
a trio of ultra-quiet PWM fans with
specially inclined fins designed to create
less turbulence at higher rpms, which
results in a card capable of running at
higher rpms without producing as
much noise as a stock GTX 580 with
fans running at similar speeds. A pair
of copper heatpipes helps evacuate heat,


and, according to Gigabyte, this card runs
22% cooler than the reference design.
Other Gigabyte staples, such as 2-ounce
copper PCB, Japanese solid caps,
ferrite core chokes, and tier 1 Samsung
and Hynix memory also make this an
attractive option. Gigabyte also bundles
in an HDMI cable, which is a nice bonus.
Our goal here is to get any game on
the market running blisteringly fast, at
high resolutions, with every killer effect
enabled, and all settings maxed out.
We don’t like to brag, but we think our
pair of Gigabyte GTX 580s in SLI can
handle that.



Feed Back
Great Graphics Card, If You Can Afford It!!!
By Robert Gadziemski
Being and advanced computer user I found it really easy to install without any instructions (although I imagine you could easily do this with the included instructions). I put it in place of my 285GTX. Installed the 8-pin and 6-pin Cables from by power supply. Connected my computer monitor to it, powered up my computer, installed the lasted drivers off NVidia's website, and was on my way without any problems at all. I even have this hooked up to my computer monitor with an HDMI 1.4a cable (not that I need it since my monitor doesn't do 3D, but I got it on sale for [...] bucks.)

One of the things that I have noticed is that it runs cooler and quieter in my computer case than my old 285GTX. I have a thermometer on my case so I can monitor the temperature at any time. My case is now 5-7 degrees (F) cooler. This is a nice improvement if heat is a problem for you.

I don't have any games on my computer that use a lot of direct X 11 features. I was however able to run "Lord of the Rings Online" at my computer's max resolution (1920x1200@60hz) using direct X 11 mode with everything turned on without any noticeable slowdown other than lag caused by my connection (cable Modem service where I am is iffy sometimes.) It also plays every modern game I have such as Call of Duty Black OPS and Medal of Honor with everything turned on, without any slow down at all. Even while playing multiplayer in both games. While performance will probably vary from system to system, this is the fastest graphics card I have used so far. I will post an update how it plays with other new games I just happen to buy. If you want benchmark testing results you can just Google "580 GTX reviews". There are a ton of them and since I only own one card I cannot tell you how it is using SLI.

While this graphics card is expensive, it is currently the fastest single graphics card you can buy without an SLI/Crossfire solution and if the price is not a killer for you, then I highly recommend this card. It is a quieter and cooler running graphics card than previous generations of cards (by NVidia) and handles just about anything you can throw at it. Hope this helps. 


Best Card I've Ever Owned
By Christopher Deweese
The EVGA GTX 580 is by far the best single gpu on the market. I recently upgraded from a Diamond HD 5870, and I can honestly say that Nvidia is back on top. Installation is so easy. It fit nicely in my Antec 900 case. Plus, temps and power draw are much improved when compared to the 480. All the benchmarks I've seen put this card on top of all others. It even outperforms some dual gpu cards. My temps at idle are around 40c with full load temps in the 80's. All of my games run flawlessly with this card. Most games run at a full 60 fps with all settings maxed out (e.g. Black Ops, Starcraft 2, Modern Warfare 2, Fallout 3, Bad Company 2). Crysis runs around 40-50 fps. Half Life 2 runs incredibly smoothly, especially when compared to my old 5870. The image tended to stutter with the 5870. I haven't seen any glitches with the 580. I'm very happy with my purchase and intend to go SLI eventually.

Specs: Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8ghz, 12gb Adata 1333mhz ddr3, 850wt psu, Gigabyte GA-x58-ud3r, Corsair A70 cpu cooler, 1 TB WD Caviar Black HDD.

See More FeedBack

Article From : Computer Power User  Magazine

Click here to Read more...

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Trendnet TEW-687GA 450Mbps Gaming Adapter

0 comments
Trendnet’s 450Mbps TEW-687GA
gaming adapter is, in a word, fast.
And, in another word, simple.
The adapter—really a network bridge—
has a network port that allows you to add
one Ethernet-ready device to the wireless
network. The idea is that one uses an
Ethernet cable to connect the adapter to a
gaming console, computer, DVR, or other
Ethernet-enabled device; the adapter then
connects to your wireless network, bridging
the two networks.
Here’s the simple part: With WPS (Wi-Fi
Protected Setup), you don’t have to worry
about handshaking, sorting out security
protocols, and other tedium. (Nothing you
can’t handle, but who wants to spend 20
minutes setting it up?) It just works. Press
the WPS button on the router (in this case
a 450Mbps Trendnet TEW-691GR), and


Specs: Connectivity: Ethernet, wireless
2.412GHz to 2.472GHz with MIMO;
Security: WPA2; Wireless data rate: up to
450Mbps; Setup: WPS, with browser-based
management; LEDs: Power, LAN, wireless;
Dimensions: 5.3 x 2.4 x 4.6 inches (HxWxD);
Warranty: 3-year limited
then press the WPS button on the adapter.
In 30 seconds, everything is connected. And
it reconnected with no problem, even when
we unplugged the adapter, moved it around,
and attached it to different devices.
And here’s the fast part: When paired
with a compatible router, the TEW-
687GA consistently breaks the 150Mbps
barrier, even on a network with legacy
devices running on it. We regularly got
internal speeds of 200Mbps or more. And
regardless of the mode in which we were
running (n-only, b/g-only, mixed), we
essentially doubled the internal speed of
any device we connected to the adapter, as
long as it was paired with the compatible
router (which, at the time of this writing,
was the TEW-691GR).
If you can get your hands on a
compatible router, give the TEW-687GA
a shot. You’ll get speeds that are plenty
good enough for most gaming and video
streaming applications.
Click here to Read more...

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Processor : Intel Core i7-2600K

0 comments
As of press time, the Intel Core i7-
2600K was the fastest Sandy Bridge desktop
processor available. It offers 8-way
processing (four physical cores with Hyper-
Threading) at a standard clock speed of
3.4GHz. The “K” designation also means
that the processor and the integrated
graphics core is fully unlocked, so you can
set the multiplier and base clock as high as
the cooling in your system allows you to go.
The Core i7-2600K includes all of Intel’s
newest goodies. For example, Intel Turbo
Boost 2.0 technology automatically pushes
the chip’s performance to 3.8GHz when the
processor is under load, as long as the CPU
stays within thermal limits. You’ll also find
Intel’s Hyper-Threading, a feature that isn’t
included on the Intel Core i5-2500K.
There are built-in instruction sets for
SSE 4.1/4.2 and AVX (a 256-bit instruction
set extension to SSE for floating
point-intensive applications). The Core

i7-2600K also offers 8MB of shared
Intel Smart Cache for fast access to data.
The memory controller integrated
into the Core i7-2600K supports dualchannel
DDR3 clocked up to 1,333MHz
for a maximum memory bandwidth
of 21GBps. Maximum memory size
is 32GB.
The base clock speed of the i7-2600K
is 100MHz, while the multiplier is 34.
When overclocking, we like that you
can change the base clock and/or the
multiplier, so you can tinker with the
settings to find the best speed. Of course,
you can also boost the CPU’s voltage to
push the limits even further.
Most overclocking experts have found
that you can hit clock frequencies around
4.4GHz without making any adjustments
to the Intel Core i7-2600K’s voltage, and
the 1GHz jump in speed is a good amount
of headroom when compared to other 

high-end processors. In our build, we were
able to hit 4.7GHz with minimal effort.
Pairing the Intel Core i7-2600K with
MSI’s P67-GD80 (B3) disables the chip’s
integrated graphics core, but we’d be remiss if
we didn’t mention the i7-2600K’s integrated
graphics capabilities. Those who picked a
motherboard with an Intel H67 chipset will
be able to harness Intel HD 3000 graphics,
which are capable of playing some of today’s
games at basic image quality settings. You’ll
also enjoy Intel’s Quick Sync Video (hardware
acceleration for image and video editing),
Intel’s InTRU 3D Technology (supports 3D
playback), and dual-display capability.
We also like that the Core i7-2600K is
comparably affordable with the rest of
Intel’s high-end lineup. The ease and
headroom for overclocking makes the
Core i7-2600K an even better value.




Core i7-2600K
$329
Intel
Add to cart


Specs: Socket: LGA1155; Clock speed: 3.4GHz (3.8GHz Turbo); 8MB L3 Smart
Cache; 95W max TDP; Hyper-Threading enabled; Turbo Boost enabled 










Article From Computer Power User  Magazine
Click here to Read more...

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Core i7-2600K Overclocking Souped-Up Sandy Bridge Blows Up Benchmarks

0 comments
For about $330, the Intel Sandy Bridge-based
Core i7-2600K quad-core processor represents
an excellent value for performance-conscious
enthusiasts. With decent cooling, some tweaking
know-how, and a little bit of luck, an overclocked
Core i7-2600K can perform on par with or even
better than Intel’s current flagship 6-core processor,
the Core i7-990X.






Intel’s Sandy Bridge-based second-gen
Core processor family arrived back
in January to much fanfare. The new
processors offered significant performance
gains over the previous generation, an
integrated graphics core that was head and
shoulders above anything Intel had offered
before, lightning-fast video encoding, and
impressively low power consumption. Save
for a few quibbles here and there, it seemed
that Intel had hit one out of the ballpark.
A few weeks after launch, however,
troubling news of a defect in the 6 Series
chipset that affected the reliability of its
3Gbps SATA ports halted shipments and
forced a recall—highly disappointing for
enthusiasts itching to upgrade, to say the
least. The problem was immediately
identified and quickly remedied, though,
and by the time you read this, motherboards
based on the fixed B3 revision of the 6 Series
chipsets should be plentiful on store shelves.
Let the upgrades begin!
Now that Intel has ironed out Sandy
Bridge’s initial wrinkles, we thought
it was the perfect time to find out what
the platform could really do. Armed with
the fastest Sandy Bridge-based processor
available, the Core i7-2600K, and an
enthusiast-class motherboard from Asus,
the P8P67 Deluxe, we set out to overclock
the 2600K using nothing but air-cooling.

OC Prerequisites
There are a few things prospective
Sandy Bridge overclockers need to know.
First, much of what we’ve all learned about
overclocking with older parts is no longer
relevant. Intel has made some changes to
the platform that make BCLK adjustments
next to useless. The current D2-stepping
processors don’t react well to sub-zero temps
or super-high voltages, and disabling sleep
states or Turbo Boost isn’t necessary. In
fact, it’s the Turbo Boost settings that need
to be altered to overclock a Sandy Bridge
processor. At this time, users must also have
a P67-chipset based motherboard, preferably
targeted at enthusiasts, to overclock a Sandy
Bridge CPU like the Core i7-2600K. The
other members of the 6-series
chipset family simply don’t
allow it at this time.
For the largest speed gains,
Sandy Bridge overclockers
must also opt for a K series, or
fully unlocked, CPU. Non-K
series parts are only partially
unlocked and can’t be pushed
nearly as far with the limited
multiplier and BCLK settings
currently available.
With the relative immaturity of the
platform, it’s also very important to stay up
to date with EFI or BIOS updates. With
the Asus motherboard we used for this
project, each successive EFI update changed
the overclocking characteristics, and some
of the updates even had features specifically
designed to boost the overclocking capabilities.
Motherboard manufacturers are still
mastering the inner workings of the Sandy
Bridge platform, so keeping the mobo up to
date is definitely a good idea.
Finally, as has always been the case, good
cooling is also a must. Sandy Bridge-based
processors are particularly power-efficient and
have fine-grained clock-gating capabilities,
though; you may be surprised how far the
chips can be pushed with nothing but a
quality air cooler. To prove this point, we
stuck with Intel’s XTS100H cooler, which
ships with K series Sandy Bridge processors.


 The Intel XTS100H tower-type
cooler included with Socket
LGA1155 Core i5 and Core
i7 K series processors
does a respectable job of
keeping CPU temperatures
in check. Using this “stock”
cooler, we were able to
push a Core i7-2600K to over
4.6GHz with perfect stability
and zero throttling.

Mod Mania
With many of the enthusiast-class
P67-motherbaords on the market, you
can overclock Sandy Bridge processors
a couple of ways. On our P8P67 Deluxe,
for example, the main BIOS screen has a
simple performance option that, with
a simple click of a button, will
push the processor up a few ticks
when Turbo is engaged. For
more granular control, though,
manually manipulating some
settings is the way to go.
For a straight-up CPU overclock,
you’ll need to alter the
following three settings: peak
Turbo Boost multiplier, CPU
core voltage, and, for a bit
more performance, the BCLK.
Admittedly, BCLK adjustments
will offer only minor boosts because
most Sandy Bridge processor and P67
motherboard combinations won’t hit BCLK
frequencies higher than about 105MHz,
a paltry 5% increase over the default. For
more aggressive overclocks, you can adjust
memory frequencies with K series processors
and, of course, a number of motherboardlevel
components can also be tweaked in an
attempt to eke out a little more performance.
By default, the Core i7-2600K has a base
multiplier of 34, for a standard frequency
of 3.4GHz (34 x 100MHz) and a peak
Turbo Boost frequency of 3.8GHz, which
is attained by boosting the multiplier to
38. With K series Sandy Bridge processors,
although a peak Turbo Boost multiplier
of up to 57 is available (for a technical
peak of 5.7GHz), you’re not likely to hit
speeds that high without some exotic system
mods. To overclock the Core i7-2600K,
all that is necessary is to increase the peak
Turbo multiplier until the maximum stable
frequency is reached.

In addition to adequate cooling,
overclocking Sandy Bridge-based
processors at this time requires one
more thing: a P67-based motherboard
designed with overclocking in
mind. There are a number of quirks
associated with overclocking Sandy
Bridge-based processors, and if the
motherboard isn’t designed to cope
with them, keeping a system stable
will be difficult.





For our mod, we first entered the motherboard’s
EFI configuration menus and
boosted the processor’s voltage to 1.35V, a
0.16V bump from the stock voltage. If you
want to test the waters with voltages higher
than that, we’d suggest using high-end air- or
liquid-cooling. With the voltage increased,
we bumped the Turbo multiplier to 40, then
booted Windows and looped Cinebench
11.5 to fully tax the processor at 4GHz to
check for stability. We were good to go, so we
re-booted again, raised the multiplier further,
and ultimately found a multiplier of 46, for
an effective top speed of 4.6GHz, was our
max. At 47, the system wasn’t perfectly stable.
At that point, we backed
the multiplier down to 45 and
began to adjust the BCLK.
The BCLK topped out at only
103MHz, for a final peak clock
speed of 4.64GHz. We could
have stopped with the multiplier
set to 46, but by altering the
BCLK, even if only a little bit, we
ultimately ended up with a higher
peak overclock and a slight boost
to memory bandwidth. (Altering
the CPU multiplier alone won’t
affect memory performance.)
Sandy Bridge Rocks
Although the overclocking process for
Sandy Bridge is somewhat different than
previous generations, it’s still quite easy,
and the performance gains can be massive.
Making a $330 quad-core processor
outperform a $1,000 6-core Intel CPU
required nothing more than a good
motherboard and the stock Intel cooler.
Sandy Bridge may not offer all of
the overclocking freedom of older Intel
platforms, but there’s still plenty of fun to
be had and performance to be gained.


Many enthusiast-class P67-based motherboards
are outfitted with EFI (Extensible Firmware Interface),
which is a replacement for the aging system BIOS.
Some of the EFI configuration menus on these
enthusiast-class boards offer simple one-click
overclocking options.





Performance: Before & After The Mod
We ran a handful of popular
applications and benchmarks
to see just how much additional
performance we were able to
extract from our overclocked
Core i7-2600K-based system.
In the chart presented here, we
have benchmark scores from
the following three test-bed
configurations: the stock Core
i7-2600K, the Core i7-2600K
overclocked to 4.64GHz, and Intel’s
current flagship Core i7-990X six-core
processor running at its stock speeds.
The numbers tell an interesting
story. Obviously, overclocking the
Core i7-2600K to 4.64GHz resulted
in some large performance
gains. The overclocked processor
outpaced its stock counterpart by
margins ranging from 13.3% to
42.47%. The smallest gains were
realized in the SiSoft Sandra
memory bandwidth benchmark
and in the less taxing LAME
MT encoding tests. The gaming
tests and processor-intensive
rendering benchmarks showed
the largest improvements.
Comparing the performance of
our overclocked Core i7-2600K
to the Core i7-990X processor
proves that you don’t need to
spend $1,000 on a CPU to have the
fastest rig on the block. Although
it wasn’t a clean sweep, the overclocked
quad-core Core i7-2600K
was faster than the six-core
Core i7-990X in four of the eight
benchmarks we ran, and in three of
the tests where the Core i7-2600K
trailed Intel’s flagship, the delta
separating the two processors was
less than 5%.

Article From : Computer Power User  Magazine
Click here to Read more...

Friday, April 15, 2011

Gigabyte G1.Sniper

0 comments
G1.Sniper
$449.99
Gigabyte
Add to Cart









Specs: Socket LGA1366; Intel X58 chipset; Max memory: 24GB (DDR3-2200 OC); Slots: 3 PCI-E x16, 2 PCI-E x1, 1 PCI; Ports: 2 6Gbps SATA, 6 3Gbps SATA, 2 3Gbps eSATA, up to 12 USB 2.0,4 USB 3.0, 2 FireWire, 1 Gigabit Ethernet
Test system specs: CPU: 3.33GHz Intel Core i7-980X; RAM: 4GB OCZ DDR3-2000; Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6990; Storage: 256GB Plextor PX-256M2S SSD

Here’s an interesting approach to a gaming
motherboard: Instead of designing the
board for overclocking, build one that has
as many optimized audio and networking
capabilities as possible in addition to support
for powerful graphics and CPUs.
The Gigabyte G1.Sniper was definitely
developed with the gaming experience
in mind. The onboard audio is handled
by the Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi digital
audio processor along with Dolby
Digital Live (the latter of which encodes
audio in real time), and a built-in front
headphone amplifier.
To help prevent client-based network
lag, the G1.Sniper has Bigfoot Networks’
Killer E2100 Game Networking Platform
baked in. The platform includes a dedicated
NPU (network processing unit) with
1GB of DDR2 memory, with technology
designed to route some network data to
the NPU rather than the network stack for
a performance boost.
The G1.Sniper also supports Intel’s
latest six-core beast, the Core i7-990X, as
well as 3-way CrossFireX or SLI, 6Gbps
SATA, and USB 3.0.
This board is a performer, and the
bells and whistles contribute to the user
experience in a meaningful way.

Benchmark Results Gigabyte G1.Sniper
3DMark11
Overall                          X3289
Graphics Score              3045
Physics Score                8061
Combined Score            3461
PCMark Vantage Pro
Overall                         17879
Memories                     11357
TV And Movies              6958
Gaming                        18737
Music                           18033
Communications           18101
Productivity                  18136
HDD                            22893
POV-Ray 3.7*               1554.49 PPS
Cinebench  11.5
CPU**                         8.73
Left 4 Dead 2               132.63
Aliens vs. Predator       48.4
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.              40.3


Article by Computer Power User  Magazine


Click here to Read more...

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

AMD Radeon HD 6990

0 comments
AMD Radeon HD 6990
$712 ❘ AMD
Add to Cart












Specs: GPU: Dual Cayman XTs; Core clock: 830MHz; Memory: 256-bit bus, 4GB
GDDR5 (1,250MHz); 3,072 stream processors; 192 texture units; 64 ROPs
Test system specs: CPU: 3.33GHz Intel Core i7-980X; Motherboard:
Gigabyte G1.Sniper (Intel X58); RAM: 4GB OCZ DDR3-2000; Storage: 256GB
Plextor PX-256M2S-02 SSD

I t’s no exaggeration to say that AMD’s latest
dual-GPU monster, the Radeon HD 6990,
is the fastest graphics card on the planet, but
context is crucial to evaluating what AMD
accomplished with this card.
The former king of the hill, AMD’s
dual-GPU HD 5970, features two 40nm
Cypress GPUs down-clocked to keep the
card below the 375-watt PCI-E spec. The
6990, also sporting a pair of 40nm GPUs,
has double the memory (on the same 256-bit
bus) and an additional 32 texture units.
Between Cypress and Cayman, AMD
also tweaked the graphics architecture,
split the graphics engine in two for
better vertex and geometry performance,
and moved from VLIW5 (Very Long
Instruction Word) to VLIW4-based
design that significantly optimized the
parts of the GPU that worked the hardest.
The revamped SIMDs are capable of
delivering better compute performance
in less space. AMD provided the 6990
with the 6950’s 830MHz core clocks, and
the 4GB (2GB per GPU) of GDDR5
memory is clocked at 1,250MHz. And
then there’s the second BIOS.
Like the 6970 before it, the 6990
features the same dual-BIOS toggle
switch, questionably dubbed “AUSUM”
(Antilles Unlocking Switch for Uber
Mode) which lets you run an overclocked
profile at the flip of a switch. When set
to the No. 1 position, the Radeon HD
6990 jacks its core clock up to 880MHz
and raises the core voltage from 1.12V
to 1.175V. At the overclocked settings,
the 6990 goes from a 375-watt beast to
a 450-watt monstrosity. To cope, your
system will need to have two 8-pin PCI-E
power connectors; AMD recommends at
least a 750W PSU to power one 6990.

AMD redesigned the PCB, separated
the GPUs with a large central fan, used
separate vapor chambers, and stuck
them to the die surfaces with a special
phase-change thermal
interface material. AMD
also used a pair of digital
Volterra regulators to
manage power fed to
the GPUs and binned
chips for low leakage and
superior OC headroom.
The backplane features
a single DL-DVI port and
four mini DisplayPorts,
letting you set up a fivedisplay
Eyefinity array.
AMD includes three
miniDP adapters (two
DVI and one HDMI) to
get any three monitors
running in Eyefinity right
out of the box.
At $699, the Radeon
HD 6990 is soul-crushingly
expensive; however, take
a look at the numbers
this card posts. To really
appreciate it, you need to be
running multiple monitors,
and that ain’t cheap either.
This single package is
the best-performing card
around, and it’s priced
as such because the
equivalent CrossFireX
configuration with
a pair of 6970s will
set you back roughly
$640 (after rebates).
Oh, and the single-card
performance crown?
AMD still has it.

Specs & Scores        HD 6870    HD 6990   HD 6990 OC
Core Clock            900MHz     830MHz    880MHz
Memory Clock          1,050MHz   1,250MHz  1,250MHz
Memory Interface      256-bit    256-bit   256-bit
Memory                1GB GDDR5  2GB GDDR5 2GB GDDR5
3DMark 11
3DMark Overall        P4263      X3289     X3429
Graphics Score        3935       3045      3183
Physics Score         7937       8061      8051
Combined Score        3991       3461      3595
Graphics Test 1       18.92      14.39     15.02
Graphics Test 2       19.23      17.61     18.51
Graphics Test 3       23.96      15.4      15.97
Graphics Test 4       11.47      9.02      9.45
Physics Test          25.2       25.59     25.56
Combined Test         18.56      16.1      16.72
Unigine Heaven
FPS                   17.6       50.3      52.5
Score                 444        1266      1322
Games 1,920 x 1,200
Left 4 Dead 2         95.21      170.64    172.61
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.:       24.03      63.5      66.2
Aliens vs. Predator   25.7       77.3      80.1
Games 2,560 x 1,600
Left 4 Dead           264.65     140.5     145.61
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.:       14.1       40.5      42.4
Aliens vs. Predator   15.8       48.4      50.7

Article From Computer Power User  Magazine

Click here to Read more...

Monday, April 11, 2011

Nvidia GeForce GTX 590 Review

0 comments

GeForce GTX 590
$788 ❘ Nvidia
Add to Cart
Specs: GPU: Dual GF110s; Core clock:
607MHz; Memory: 384-bit bus, 3GB GDDR5
(854MHz); 1,024 CUDA cores; 128 texture
units; 96 ROPs
Test system specs: CPU: 3.33GHz Intel Core
i7-980X; Motherboard: Gigabyte G1.Sniper
(Intel X58); RAM: 4GB OCZ DDR3-2000;
Storage: 256GB Plextor PX-256M2S-02 SSD



The difference between Nvidia’s original
Fermi GF100 and the
revamped GF110 is night
and day. For Nvidia and AMD,
faster, cooler, and quieter are the
primary design goals when making
a new GPU, and the latest evidence of
Big Green’s success is the GeForce GTX
590, the first dual-GPU card from Nvidia
since the GTX 295.
The GTX 590 features two GF110
GPUs, the same engines that power the
fastest single-GPU graphics card on the
planet, the GTX 580. Though it sounds
like an unbeatable recipe, the GTX 580
is a 244-watt card, and Nvidia needed to
make some adjustments in order to run
two of these on the same PCB. The core
and memory clocks were dropped from
772MHz to 607MHz and 1,002MHz
to 854MHz, respectively. The memory
subsystem saw little change: The 384-bit
bus for each GPU still links it to 1.5GB
of GDDR5 memory for 3GB total.

Two GPUs, One Cool Customer
The GeForce GTX 590 has a 365-
watt TDP, and although Nvidia defines
TDP as the maximum amount of power
the cooler needs to dissipate when running
3D applications, that number requires a
powerful PSU and a pair of 8-pin PCI-E
power adapters. Like AMD did with the
Radeon HD 6990, Nvidia chose to locate
the two GPUs at opposite ends of the PCB,
slap a vapor chamber on top of each, and
use a centrally located 90mm fan to
blow air over the vapor chambers.
Nvidia’s design also features a 12-layer
PCB, with the power and ground layers
consisting of 2 ounces of copper. There’s
also a 10-phase digital power controller
feeding juice to the GPUs and a pair
of dual-phase controllers distributing
power to the memory.

Aural & Visual
According to Nvidia, the GTX
590 is quieter than its previous
dual-GPU cards, and only slightly
noisier than the GTX 580. In our
tests, we did notice some extra noise
under load, but it was not much. It
is noticeably quieter than the Radeon
HD 6990, though, which should be
music to gamers’ ears.
If two GPUs still aren’t enough,
this card is your ideal route to Quad
SLI. Although two GTX 590s will
display across six monitors, three
is the max if you want to keep SLI
enabled. Dual-GPU cards are wasted
on a single monitor, so it’s nice to
see Nvidia ponied up on three
Dual-Link DVI ports and a single
mini DisplayPort on the GTX 590’s
backplane. You can connect three
3D-capable 120Hz monitors to this
card and enjoy Nvidia 3D Vision
Surround right out of the box. To
make this package even sweeter,
Nvidia just announced that its 3D
Vision kit is now $149 and the active
shutter glasses now have better battery life.

Niche Unleashed
Stacked against AMD’s new Radeon
HD 6990, the GTX 590 falls just short
performance-wise. With both cards priced
at a bank-breaking $699, Nvidia appears to
be betting that 3D Vision Surround, PhysX,
CUDA, and less noise offset the measly
performance difference. If you agree, you
might consider par-ticipating in some of the
riskier clinical trials to fund this indulgence.
Do it for the science . . . and the games.

                            Radeon            Nvidia
Specs & Scores     HD 6990          GTX 590
Price                     $699                $788
Core Clock             830MHz            608MHz
Memory Clock        1,250MHz         854MHz
Memory Interface    256-bit            384-bit
Memory                 2GB GDDR5     3GB GDDR5
3DMark 11
3DMark Overall       X3289              X2992
Graphics Score        3045               2838
Physics Score          8061               8076
Combined Score      3461               2505
Graphics Test 1*      14.39              14.26
Graphics Test 2*      17.61               14.61
Graphics Test 3*      15.4                14.31
Graphics Test 4*      9.02                8.65
Physics Test*          25.59               25.64
Combined Test*      16.1                11.66
Unigine Heaven
FPS                        50.3                 54.2
Score                     1266                1366
Games 1,920 x 1,200
Left 4 Dead 2          170.64              166.77

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.:         63.5                 64.9

Aliens vs. Predator    77.3                 66.4

2,650 x 1,600
Left 4 Dead 2            140.5               130.88

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.:          40.5                 40.6

Aliens vs. Predator     48.4                 42.2

Article From Computer Power User  Magazine





Click here to Read more...